BRAVE COMMERCE | Episode Teva Pharmaceuticals’ Dipesh Patel on Building Digital Capabilities in a Trust-First Category
In this episode of BRAVE COMMERCE, Rachel Tipograph and Sarah Hofstetter sit down with Dipesh Patel, Senior Director, Digital Transformation & Ecommerce, Global OTC at Teva Pharmaceuticals, to discuss what it takes to drive transformation in a category where trust, accuracy, and regulation shape the pace of change. Dipesh shares how his background in mathematics and early experience in retail influence his approach to problem-solving, ambiguity, and digital transformation.
They also explore Dipesh’s move from Unilever to Teva, including the difference between operating in a mature consumer goods environment versus building capabilities in OTC. The conversation also dives into AI’s role in content creation, why speed alone isn’t enough in healthcare, and how brands can use stronger systems and guardrails to scale content while maintaining control.
Key takeaways
- AI can scale content production, but strong guardrails and human oversight remain essential.
- In healthcare and OTC, brands must balance digital speed with trust and regulatory rigor.
- Building digital capabilities from scratch requires a different mindset than optimizing mature systems.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
00:00:01,300 –> 00:00:03,520
Speaker 1: We need humans in this process because who can really
2
00:00:03,560 –> 00:00:07,640
Speaker 1: judge the quality of content? Humans. But when AI has
3
00:00:07,660 –> 00:00:09,340
Speaker 1: been really useful, if you kind of break down the
4
00:00:09,360 –> 00:00:13,159
Speaker 1: content development process, it’s been how do you breathe faster?
5
00:00:13,480 –> 00:00:17,600
Speaker 1: Can you produce more things at scale? Can you do
6
00:00:17,840 –> 00:00:22,640
Speaker 1: voiceover and copywriting and transcreation and all of these things
7
00:00:22,680 –> 00:00:25,840
Speaker 1: and get more for the same price for more for
8
00:00:25,880 –> 00:00:29,120
Speaker 1: less in a much faster time? But the ultimate judge
9
00:00:29,160 –> 00:00:32,889
Speaker 1: of quality is going to be human driving that process.
10
00:00:33,270 –> 00:00:34,950
Speaker 1: Do I think at some point in the future, you
11
00:00:35,210 –> 00:00:38,479
Speaker 1: get more agentic models doing more of the work? I
12
00:00:38,520 –> 00:00:39,340
Speaker 1: think yes.
13
00:00:42,979 –> 00:00:46,880
Speaker 2: Welcome to today’s episode of Free of Commerce. I’m Sarah Hofstadter.
14
00:00:46,979 –> 00:00:49,680
Speaker 3: And I’m Rachel Tippegraph. And this is a show that
15
00:00:49,740 –> 00:00:52,940
Speaker 3: talks about what’s relevant in commerce for the world’s biggest brands.
16
00:00:52,960 –> 00:00:53,780
Speaker 1: Welcome to Free of Commerce.
17
00:01:01,720 –> 00:01:06,480
Speaker 3: Sarah, let’s set the stage. It’s the 1980s in Queens.
18
00:01:07,440 –> 00:01:08,120
Speaker 1: Where are you?
19
00:01:08,560 –> 00:01:14,300
Speaker 4: Depends which part of the 80s. Well, in the fall
20
00:01:14,319 –> 00:01:17,060
Speaker 4: of 88, I started high school in Queens.
21
00:01:18,340 –> 00:01:21,240
Speaker 2: And I had a very, very.
22
00:01:21,260 –> 00:01:25,380
Speaker 4: I think below the poverty line allowance. Like, I mean,
23
00:01:25,660 –> 00:01:28,259
Speaker 4: not like the general poverty line, but among other 13
24
00:01:28,260 –> 00:01:31,480
Speaker 4: year old girls, my parents did not give me enough
25
00:01:31,540 –> 00:01:36,310
Speaker 4: money like for, you know, lunch, transportation, whatever. I did
26
00:01:36,390 –> 00:01:40,310
Speaker 4: a decent amount of babysitting. I sold barrettes. I designed
27
00:01:40,370 –> 00:01:41,250
Speaker 4: and sold barrettes.
28
00:01:41,569 –> 00:01:43,630
Speaker 3: So for people who don’t know, clips in your hair?
29
00:01:43,750 –> 00:01:44,770
Speaker 2: Oh, hair clips, right.
30
00:01:44,810 –> 00:01:47,230
Speaker 4: Like, I’m sorry, I put myself in the 80s and
31
00:01:47,250 –> 00:01:49,990
Speaker 4: I used the 80s lingo. What was Rachel like in
32
00:01:50,010 –> 00:01:50,990
Speaker 4: the 90s in Jersey?
33
00:01:51,450 –> 00:01:56,990
Speaker 3: Also trying to make money. Like literally selling anything in sight.
34
00:01:57,010 –> 00:01:57,110
Speaker 1: Yeah.
35
00:01:58,020 –> 00:02:02,940
Speaker 3: Whether it was baked goods, creepy crawlers, my services, which
36
00:02:03,000 –> 00:02:05,750
Speaker 3: was essentially at that time teaching people how to rollerblade.
37
00:02:06,670 –> 00:02:08,310
Speaker 3: That was the thing I could do really well.
38
00:02:08,330 –> 00:02:09,489
Speaker 2: I love that.
39
00:02:09,870 –> 00:02:12,450
Speaker 3: Really just hawking my time and figuring out how to
40
00:02:12,470 –> 00:02:13,050
Speaker 3: make a dollar.
41
00:02:13,070 –> 00:02:14,710
Speaker 2: I think it says a lot.
42
00:02:15,050 –> 00:02:17,710
Speaker 4: One of the many in the rotation of interview questions
43
00:02:17,770 –> 00:02:19,510
Speaker 4: I have is, you know, what was your first job?
44
00:02:19,690 –> 00:02:22,690
Speaker 4: But like your cash job. When you hear the stories
45
00:02:22,730 –> 00:02:27,250
Speaker 4: of people who didn’t just do the standard job, You
46
00:02:27,290 –> 00:02:30,470
Speaker 4: kind of understand what they’ve got going on. And it
47
00:02:30,510 –> 00:02:32,230
Speaker 4: doesn’t matter what kind of background they come from. It’s
48
00:02:32,250 –> 00:02:34,860
Speaker 4: whether or not you’ve got either that hustle or drive
49
00:02:34,919 –> 00:02:39,280
Speaker 4: or creativity or something. And what’s interesting about Depeche is
50
00:02:39,300 –> 00:02:42,540
Speaker 4: that he said he started his retail experience at the
51
00:02:42,600 –> 00:02:43,360
Speaker 4: age of six.
52
00:02:43,440 –> 00:02:45,380
Speaker 2: Now, you know, I don’t know much about child labor.
53
00:02:45,400 –> 00:02:46,820
Speaker 2: That does sound a little early.
54
00:02:47,630 –> 00:02:49,389
Speaker 3: But his parents were his employers.
55
00:02:49,570 –> 00:02:51,430
Speaker 2: His parents were his employers.
56
00:02:52,050 –> 00:02:54,109
Speaker 4: I don’t know that that sounds entirely better, but it
57
00:02:54,150 –> 00:02:55,490
Speaker 4: certainly sounds slightly better.
58
00:02:56,180 –> 00:02:58,060
Speaker 2: But when you’ve got the bug, you’ve got the bug,
59
00:02:58,080 –> 00:02:59,280
Speaker 2: you know? Absolutely.
60
00:03:00,000 –> 00:03:03,300
Speaker 3: Well, Dipesh, who Sarah and I knew from his Unilever days,
61
00:03:03,380 –> 00:03:05,760
Speaker 3: is now going to talk to us about moving over
62
00:03:06,030 –> 00:03:09,269
Speaker 3: into more of the OTC pharma category and how his
63
00:03:09,669 –> 00:03:12,770
Speaker 3: young self has shaped his future self. So on that note,
64
00:03:12,790 –> 00:03:13,790
Speaker 3: let’s bring him onto the show.
65
00:03:14,910 –> 00:03:18,490
Speaker 4: Today, we are happy to have Dipesh Patel, Senior Director
66
00:03:18,570 –> 00:03:22,000
Speaker 4: of Transformation and E-Commerce for Global OTC, say that five
67
00:03:22,040 –> 00:03:26,920
Speaker 4: times fast, at Teva Pharmaceuticals. Deepesh, thank you so much
68
00:03:26,980 –> 00:03:27,940
Speaker 4: for joining us.
69
00:03:28,150 –> 00:03:29,770
Speaker 2: I know we’ve been waiting for a while to have
70
00:03:29,790 –> 00:03:30,670
Speaker 2: this conversation.
71
00:03:30,690 –> 00:03:33,990
Speaker 1: No, really excited to be here. Thanks for inviting me.
72
00:03:34,470 –> 00:03:37,010
Speaker 4: I’m really excited that we got connected and I’m excited
73
00:03:37,030 –> 00:03:38,790
Speaker 4: to get into the hood on this. But I want
74
00:03:38,830 –> 00:03:42,250
Speaker 4: to start a little bit like just talking about your background,
75
00:03:42,310 –> 00:03:44,860
Speaker 4: like your OG background, which is in.
76
00:03:44,840 –> 00:03:48,580
Speaker 2: Mathematics, which we don’t have a lot of on the show.
77
00:03:48,600 –> 00:03:53,780
Speaker 4: So how have you applied that educational background.
78
00:03:53,240 –> 00:03:55,620
Speaker 1: To your roles over your career and.
79
00:03:56,360 –> 00:04:00,930
Speaker 4: And bonus question, what classes in uni did you wish
80
00:04:00,970 –> 00:04:04,210
Speaker 4: you had taken for the job you have today?
81
00:04:04,790 –> 00:04:06,790
Speaker 1: Oh, wow. Yeah, that’s going to say a lot about me.
82
00:04:07,350 –> 00:04:10,990
Speaker 1: So I grew up in retail. My parents owned a newsagent.
83
00:04:11,090 –> 00:04:14,390
Speaker 1: We used to live above the store. And so I’ve
84
00:04:14,410 –> 00:04:17,480
Speaker 1: kind of been working in retail since I was six
85
00:04:17,540 –> 00:04:20,460
Speaker 1: or seven, having to go into the store or do
86
00:04:20,500 –> 00:04:23,690
Speaker 1: the newspapers, fill up the shelves. And so that kind
87
00:04:23,730 –> 00:04:28,490
Speaker 1: of really rooted me in numbers, and I really enjoyed that.
88
00:04:28,990 –> 00:04:34,250
Speaker 1: But also my values in hardware, entrepreneurship, customer service. And
89
00:04:34,270 –> 00:04:36,890
Speaker 1: so then you kind of take that forward and you
90
00:04:36,950 –> 00:04:38,710
Speaker 1: figure out, oh, what are you really good at? Oh,
91
00:04:38,750 –> 00:04:41,250
Speaker 1: I’m really good at numbers. So do maths at uni.
92
00:04:41,290 –> 00:04:45,950
Speaker 1: That’s the best way to utilize your skills. And honestly,
93
00:04:46,290 –> 00:04:48,810
Speaker 1: everyone can say it’s kind of a boring job. subject
94
00:04:48,870 –> 00:04:50,469
Speaker 1: or it could be if you’re not very good at it,
95
00:04:50,610 –> 00:04:53,850
Speaker 1: but I think it gives you, it’s given me four
96
00:04:54,150 –> 00:04:56,690
Speaker 1: fundamental things I think have really helped me in my career.
97
00:04:56,710 –> 00:05:00,570
Speaker 1: So the first is really constructive thinking. It really helps
98
00:05:00,610 –> 00:05:04,150
Speaker 1: my brain to, and it trained me to break down
99
00:05:04,270 –> 00:05:08,180
Speaker 1: big problems into small solvable chunks, which if you think
100
00:05:08,190 –> 00:05:10,659
Speaker 1: about it, it’s kind of what digital transformation is. It’s
101
00:05:10,680 –> 00:05:13,920
Speaker 1: a roadblocks of lots of different things as you go
102
00:05:13,960 –> 00:05:17,000
Speaker 1: through a maturity curve and over a roadmap of time.
103
00:05:17,860 –> 00:05:22,530
Speaker 1: It’s also shaped my approach to, say, ambiguity. You know,
104
00:05:22,550 –> 00:05:25,210
Speaker 1: when you’re working in e-commerce, and both of you guys
105
00:05:25,230 –> 00:05:28,609
Speaker 1: would know this for sure, this is just one problem
106
00:05:28,690 –> 00:05:31,410
Speaker 1: after another problem of what was the root cause of
107
00:05:31,710 –> 00:05:33,970
Speaker 1: the solution and how do you make things better? So
108
00:05:33,990 –> 00:05:38,219
Speaker 1: when you’re working in frameworks or performance models or operating models,
109
00:05:38,800 –> 00:05:43,520
Speaker 1: trying to weigh up options, math is all about defining variables,
110
00:05:43,880 –> 00:05:48,120
Speaker 1: isolate constraints, test scenarios, and optimise. And I think that’s
111
00:05:48,200 –> 00:05:50,900
Speaker 1: probably just naturally into the kind of way I work.
112
00:05:50,980 –> 00:05:54,440
Speaker 1: It suits me really well. And then obviously massive data
113
00:05:54,779 –> 00:05:58,560
Speaker 1: and what’s e-commerce and even the new forms of digital
114
00:05:58,600 –> 00:06:02,060
Speaker 1: marketing that isn’t data, right? So it’s a constant balance
115
00:06:02,550 –> 00:06:07,750
Speaker 1: that offers me really good signals between what is like
116
00:06:07,850 –> 00:06:10,770
Speaker 1: real truth and then what is noise and what’s in between.
117
00:06:11,350 –> 00:06:13,170
Speaker 1: So I’d say, you know, it’s given me a lot,
118
00:06:13,330 –> 00:06:18,550
Speaker 1: but ultimately it fuels my curiosity. You asked me the
119
00:06:18,580 –> 00:06:21,990
Speaker 1: question about what class I would have taken. My curiosity
120
00:06:22,010 –> 00:06:25,470
Speaker 1: sometimes takes the better of me. I do remember I
121
00:06:25,550 –> 00:06:31,370
Speaker 1: studied University College London. And in the first year, there
122
00:06:31,390 –> 00:06:34,170
Speaker 1: was kind of selectives you could take. And there was
123
00:06:34,250 –> 00:06:37,450
Speaker 1: one course on offer called The Theory of Traffic Flow.
124
00:06:38,310 –> 00:06:40,610
Speaker 1: And it sounds way different.
125
00:06:40,920 –> 00:06:42,740
Speaker 2: Say more. I want to hear all about this.
126
00:06:43,120 –> 00:06:43,400
Speaker 1: Yeah.
127
00:06:43,660 –> 00:06:45,400
Speaker 4: I would have signed up for that. I never would
128
00:06:45,420 –> 00:06:46,760
Speaker 4: have signed up for that now, but I would take
129
00:06:46,800 –> 00:06:48,099
Speaker 4: it as a continuing ed class.
130
00:06:48,260 –> 00:06:51,120
Speaker 1: You’re kind of sitting there going, I’ll sit in this car.
131
00:06:51,670 –> 00:06:55,169
Speaker 1: The signal on top of the road goes to like
132
00:06:55,170 –> 00:06:57,770
Speaker 1: 40 miles an hour. How does all this traffic kind
133
00:06:58,490 –> 00:07:01,210
Speaker 1: of ramp up behind you and then speed up? And
134
00:07:01,270 –> 00:07:03,510
Speaker 1: why is there suddenly traffic when there’s no accident? And
135
00:07:03,870 –> 00:07:05,590
Speaker 1: I was like, oh, I’d love to learn about that.
136
00:07:06,230 –> 00:07:07,950
Speaker 1: And so the theory of that got in my brain
137
00:07:08,029 –> 00:07:10,510
Speaker 1: over the years. He says, this would be a great
138
00:07:10,570 –> 00:07:12,650
Speaker 1: course to take. I even convinced three or four of
139
00:07:12,690 –> 00:07:15,570
Speaker 1: my friends who I’d only known for, I’d say, the
140
00:07:15,590 –> 00:07:19,910
Speaker 1: best part of three months. Let’s go take this course. Unfortunately,
141
00:07:20,650 –> 00:07:24,810
Speaker 1: the curiosity was way more than the actual reality of
142
00:07:24,870 –> 00:07:28,690
Speaker 1: the course. Yeah, I lasted, I think, two or three sessions.
143
00:07:29,110 –> 00:07:30,630
Speaker 1: And I was like, no, no, no, this is not
144
00:07:30,650 –> 00:07:32,070
Speaker 1: for me.
145
00:07:32,430 –> 00:07:34,770
Speaker 2: Oh, that’s really unfortunate because I actually want to learn
146
00:07:34,810 –> 00:07:35,300
Speaker 2: that now.
147
00:07:36,180 –> 00:07:38,890
Speaker 3: Sarah and I met you not in uni, but we
148
00:07:38,930 –> 00:07:41,610
Speaker 3: met you when you were at Unilever. And now you
149
00:07:41,650 –> 00:07:47,090
Speaker 3: have this new gig at Teva. Curious what is similar
150
00:07:47,190 –> 00:07:49,470
Speaker 3: and what is different now that you’re, what, a few
151
00:07:49,750 –> 00:07:50,190
Speaker 3: months in?
152
00:07:50,630 –> 00:07:53,580
Speaker 1: Yeah, it’s been three months now. You know, what I really,
153
00:07:53,620 –> 00:07:59,500
Speaker 1: really loved about Unilever and I found really exciting and
154
00:07:59,660 –> 00:08:03,870
Speaker 1: happy that I’m here in Teva is… They’re both really
155
00:08:03,910 –> 00:08:08,280
Speaker 1: large and they’re both very mission-driven global organizations, but also
156
00:08:08,300 –> 00:08:11,140
Speaker 1: have kind of deep heritage. So I really like that.
157
00:08:11,160 –> 00:08:16,020
Speaker 1: The other things I would say are consumers really matter
158
00:08:16,100 –> 00:08:21,200
Speaker 1: in both organizations. I think understanding consumer is really important,
159
00:08:21,220 –> 00:08:24,760
Speaker 1: but also slightly different because the motivations differ in the
160
00:08:24,800 –> 00:08:28,150
Speaker 1: different companies. And so those are, I’d say, the two
161
00:08:28,170 –> 00:08:33,020
Speaker 1: big culture is really profoundly important. important about the people
162
00:08:33,100 –> 00:08:36,020
Speaker 1: at the heart of the business. I’d say more kind
163
00:08:36,059 –> 00:08:39,520
Speaker 1: of functionally, this is on a different scale to Unilever,
164
00:08:39,600 –> 00:08:42,720
Speaker 1: but wherever you look, there are kind of pockets of
165
00:08:42,760 –> 00:08:47,480
Speaker 1: this excellent business, excellent growth, that kind of continue to
166
00:08:47,500 –> 00:08:52,170
Speaker 1: need to be harnessed consistently for global scale. And, you know,
167
00:08:52,490 –> 00:08:55,310
Speaker 1: when I look at my first three months at Teva,
168
00:08:55,330 –> 00:08:59,830
Speaker 1: I’ve seen that in our Germany business, which has nearly
169
00:08:59,850 –> 00:09:02,210
Speaker 1: a third of its business in e-commerce. And I look
170
00:09:02,250 –> 00:09:04,670
Speaker 1: at the rest of the business and it’s got a
171
00:09:04,710 –> 00:09:07,130
Speaker 1: long way to be able to reach that. And so
172
00:09:07,250 –> 00:09:10,390
Speaker 1: it’s more for me, kind of almost similar in how
173
00:09:10,429 –> 00:09:13,970
Speaker 1: you find these pockets, really get rooted into what’s working
174
00:09:13,990 –> 00:09:15,809
Speaker 1: really well and try and scale that moving.
175
00:09:15,830 –> 00:09:19,030
Speaker 2: I want to go back for a minute. I realize
176
00:09:19,050 –> 00:09:20,490
Speaker 2: you didn’t answer the bonus question.
177
00:09:21,410 –> 00:09:23,990
Speaker 4: You told me the class you took that you didn’t
178
00:09:24,110 –> 00:09:27,510
Speaker 4: love taking, but you didn’t tell me the class that
179
00:09:28,070 –> 00:09:29,430
Speaker 4: you wish you had taken.
180
00:09:29,450 –> 00:09:30,840
Speaker 1: Oh my God, yeah.
181
00:09:32,450 –> 00:09:34,510
Speaker 4: And I’m not a slave to the questions, but like
182
00:09:34,690 –> 00:09:36,209
Speaker 4: your answer was so good.
183
00:09:36,230 –> 00:09:39,110
Speaker 2: I really liked where you were going with it.
184
00:09:39,140 –> 00:09:40,559
Speaker 4: And like, there was so much that you said, like,
185
00:09:40,640 –> 00:09:43,620
Speaker 4: I love the whole thing about like math is about
186
00:09:43,660 –> 00:09:46,400
Speaker 4: like big things. You break them into small chunks. Like
187
00:09:46,440 –> 00:09:48,839
Speaker 4: that’s something that I’ve always done, but I am a
188
00:09:48,880 –> 00:09:50,180
Speaker 4: math moron.
189
00:09:50,700 –> 00:09:51,380
Speaker 2: And so when I.
190
00:09:52,630 –> 00:09:54,260
Speaker 4: Listened to everything that you were saying, I’m like, wow,
191
00:09:54,270 –> 00:09:55,870
Speaker 4: it sounds like, you know, you’ve really applied a lot
192
00:09:55,890 –> 00:09:58,110
Speaker 4: of big things. So I love the fact that you
193
00:09:58,130 –> 00:10:01,680
Speaker 4: started in retail at six, like that’s that headline. But
194
00:10:01,920 –> 00:10:04,300
Speaker 4: what is something that you wish you had learned in
195
00:10:04,400 –> 00:10:07,420
Speaker 4: uni that maybe now you’re, you might be like almost
196
00:10:07,480 –> 00:10:09,439
Speaker 4: overcompensating or trying to learn.
197
00:10:09,280 –> 00:10:12,910
Speaker 1: As you go? Yeah, I’d say it’s a completely left
198
00:10:12,970 –> 00:10:17,329
Speaker 1: field answer because the subject I was most interested in
199
00:10:17,820 –> 00:10:21,140
Speaker 1: and actually wanted to do at university was history. And
200
00:10:21,200 –> 00:10:25,309
Speaker 1: I’m still obsessed by history. But I remember a conversation
201
00:10:25,350 –> 00:10:27,630
Speaker 1: I had with my dad who was in a pub
202
00:10:27,710 –> 00:10:30,650
Speaker 1: over a beer when I was planning to go to university.
203
00:10:30,710 –> 00:10:34,589
Speaker 1: And I said, Dad, I really want to go and
204
00:10:34,610 –> 00:10:37,590
Speaker 1: do history at university. And he said, son, you are
205
00:10:37,610 –> 00:10:40,970
Speaker 1: my pension. Think again. What else are you good at?
206
00:10:41,590 –> 00:10:44,189
Speaker 1: And so I think I wish I’d done history.
207
00:10:44,650 –> 00:10:45,890
Speaker 2: That is an acceptable answer.
208
00:10:46,440 –> 00:10:47,400
Speaker 1: Is it acceptable?
209
00:10:47,740 –> 00:10:50,320
Speaker 4: It’s good because there are certain things about history that
210
00:10:50,380 –> 00:10:52,760
Speaker 4: I think are really kind of important. Just the whole
211
00:10:52,820 –> 00:10:56,579
Speaker 4: idea of pattern recognition, which is actually very similar to
212
00:10:57,760 –> 00:10:59,620
Speaker 4: math if you think about it. And so it kind
213
00:10:59,640 –> 00:11:03,180
Speaker 4: of dovetails into Rachel’s question about like the pivot from
214
00:11:03,960 –> 00:11:08,000
Speaker 4: Unilever to Teva. What are the patterns that you are
215
00:11:08,040 –> 00:11:10,559
Speaker 4: recognizing now that you’re three months into that role at Teva?
216
00:11:11,460 –> 00:11:14,099
Speaker 1: Indeed. Yeah. And like everything, there are things that are
217
00:11:14,140 –> 00:11:17,319
Speaker 1: similar and things that are I’m learning now, it’s going
218
00:11:17,340 –> 00:11:20,530
Speaker 1: to be very different, right? So obviously having spent a
219
00:11:21,070 –> 00:11:23,750
Speaker 1: fair chunk of the last three or four years in
220
00:11:24,070 –> 00:11:28,369
Speaker 1: PT and wellbeing, part of Unilever, you know, speed is currency,
221
00:11:28,530 –> 00:11:32,030
Speaker 1: innovation is really, really important to kind of drive business growth.
222
00:11:32,530 –> 00:11:34,960
Speaker 1: Whereas in healthcare, you know, what I need to kind
223
00:11:35,000 –> 00:11:37,800
Speaker 1: of learn, which I’m really excited about, is the things
224
00:11:37,820 –> 00:11:41,680
Speaker 1: which are currency is kind of trust and accuracy. So
225
00:11:41,740 –> 00:11:44,060
Speaker 1: I kind of need to learn, you know, where these
226
00:11:44,140 –> 00:11:47,030
Speaker 1: kind of different things come from, but also what I
227
00:11:47,050 –> 00:11:53,119
Speaker 1: really like is that the maturity of the capabilities in
228
00:11:53,160 –> 00:11:58,780
Speaker 1: both marketing, digital, e-commerce, it’s really high, right? So what
229
00:11:58,800 –> 00:12:01,040
Speaker 1: we’re often trying to do when we’re at Unilever is
230
00:12:01,850 –> 00:12:04,890
Speaker 1: where are we right now? How can we be leading it?
231
00:12:04,929 –> 00:12:07,589
Speaker 1: What’s the thing that hasn’t been invented yet? Where are
232
00:12:07,610 –> 00:12:10,030
Speaker 1: the consumers going and can we lead consumers there? Can
233
00:12:10,070 –> 00:12:13,110
Speaker 1: we build categories? I would say they can’t be maybe
234
00:12:13,130 –> 00:12:15,929
Speaker 1: doing transformation and you can build it on the Rolls-Royce
235
00:12:16,309 –> 00:12:21,150
Speaker 1: rather than building the Rolls-Royce. And I think here, my
236
00:12:21,200 –> 00:12:24,880
Speaker 1: problem solving brain has had to shift into how do
237
00:12:24,920 –> 00:12:28,000
Speaker 1: you not have to break things apart to build, but
238
00:12:28,080 –> 00:12:30,280
Speaker 1: actually build from scratch and use that as a way
239
00:12:30,320 –> 00:12:36,040
Speaker 1: to leapfrog competition, which I think is a different challenge.
240
00:12:36,059 –> 00:12:37,700
Speaker 1: I wouldn’t say easier challenge, but a different challenge.
241
00:12:38,370 –> 00:12:42,750
Speaker 3: Is the lack of maturity category-wide or just within the
242
00:12:42,790 –> 00:12:43,980
Speaker 3: organization that you’re working at?
243
00:12:44,620 –> 00:12:48,160
Speaker 1: A bit of both. I think Temba has broadly been
244
00:12:48,400 –> 00:12:52,540
Speaker 1: a generics company, but actually is now an innovative biopharma
245
00:12:52,600 –> 00:12:55,440
Speaker 1: company if you look at the percentage of the business.
246
00:12:55,500 –> 00:12:57,920
Speaker 1: But if you think of how their brain set is
247
00:12:57,970 –> 00:13:01,069
Speaker 1: kind of wired, it’s a bit more in that frame
248
00:13:01,230 –> 00:13:03,990
Speaker 1: of mind, which is a different type of marketing. I mean,
249
00:13:04,010 –> 00:13:06,510
Speaker 1: you’ve seen a lot of the consumer health businesses at
250
00:13:06,550 –> 00:13:11,390
Speaker 1: Traditional Pharma, the kind of moved separately or kind of
251
00:13:11,410 –> 00:13:15,210
Speaker 1: listed separately or demerged from there it’s mainly because of
252
00:13:15,270 –> 00:13:20,290
Speaker 1: the mindset being different rather than the category being different
253
00:13:20,830 –> 00:13:23,550
Speaker 1: so you know for us one of our biggest brands
254
00:13:23,630 –> 00:13:26,699
Speaker 1: is pseudocrime which if you’ve ever lived in the uk
255
00:13:26,720 –> 00:13:30,640
Speaker 1: this is a hardcore household brand for you know new
256
00:13:30,700 –> 00:13:33,660
Speaker 1: families and it’s uh in the market leader in the
257
00:13:33,679 –> 00:13:36,280
Speaker 1: nappy rash and one of the Natural Rush Cream, and
258
00:13:36,300 –> 00:13:39,080
Speaker 1: it’s one of the number one brands globally in that category.
259
00:13:39,640 –> 00:13:42,400
Speaker 1: If you think of how we talk to consumers, it’s
260
00:13:42,440 –> 00:13:47,200
Speaker 1: very consumer goods, right? So I would say that’s very similar,
261
00:13:47,220 –> 00:13:52,760
Speaker 1: not too different. But I’d say the category is opening
262
00:13:52,820 –> 00:13:55,720
Speaker 1: and moving in kind of this direction. You see more
263
00:13:57,300 –> 00:14:01,380
Speaker 1: creators being in this space. Obviously, Derma Cosmetics kind of
264
00:14:01,400 –> 00:14:04,559
Speaker 1: started that trend. the number one reason I read every
265
00:14:04,600 –> 00:14:06,590
Speaker 1: kind of research I’ve looked at since I’ve been here
266
00:14:06,610 –> 00:14:11,370
Speaker 1: for the first three months is the number one reason
267
00:14:11,630 –> 00:14:17,580
Speaker 1: consumers choose products and brands in the OTC category remains HCPs, right?
268
00:14:17,620 –> 00:14:21,540
Speaker 1: So the demand for trust and accuracy is still really,
269
00:14:21,580 –> 00:14:25,080
Speaker 1: really important. And I’m sure that will shift, right? You
270
00:14:25,100 –> 00:14:28,200
Speaker 1: see lots of transformation elements, whether I’m sure we’ll talk
271
00:14:28,240 –> 00:14:29,520
Speaker 1: about AI. Yeah.
272
00:14:29,920 –> 00:14:33,260
Speaker 3: You know, I’m curious about, every analyst is projecting that
273
00:14:33,380 –> 00:14:36,890
Speaker 3: the next big disruption with AI is in drug development.
274
00:14:37,690 –> 00:14:40,870
Speaker 3: And that very quickly over the next 18 months, like
275
00:14:40,910 –> 00:14:42,570
Speaker 3: the majority of drugs that are going to come to
276
00:14:42,610 –> 00:14:47,620
Speaker 3: market are not developed by humans, but rather by AI.
277
00:14:48,760 –> 00:14:51,860
Speaker 3: And so how do you think humans are going to
278
00:14:51,920 –> 00:14:55,300
Speaker 3: respond to the fact that their drugs are essentially being
279
00:14:55,340 –> 00:14:56,120
Speaker 3: created by machines?
280
00:14:56,520 –> 00:14:58,650
Speaker 1: I mean, that’s very interesting. I mean, I’m not sure
281
00:14:58,710 –> 00:15:01,910
Speaker 1: I’m the most qualified to answer that question, but I
282
00:15:01,950 –> 00:15:07,130
Speaker 1: would say is AI has been really important across the
283
00:15:07,170 –> 00:15:11,390
Speaker 1: board to drive productivity, right? And everywhere where we have seen,
284
00:15:11,490 –> 00:15:14,440
Speaker 1: and I can talk about marketing and e-commerce, but if
285
00:15:14,480 –> 00:15:18,800
Speaker 1: you break down the problem, generally the humans, part of
286
00:15:18,820 –> 00:15:21,560
Speaker 1: the process is always really going to be needed, right?
287
00:15:21,580 –> 00:15:25,250
Speaker 1: There’s a human quality to it. The things which computers
288
00:15:25,330 –> 00:15:28,490
Speaker 1: do and AI can do, is really speed up the process.
289
00:15:28,910 –> 00:15:33,150
Speaker 1: There’s a lot of, let’s say, screening and testing, and
290
00:15:33,950 –> 00:15:36,610
Speaker 1: that needs to get done. That takes a long time
291
00:15:36,670 –> 00:15:40,100
Speaker 1: in pharma development. And if AI can help speed up
292
00:15:40,130 –> 00:15:43,760
Speaker 1: that process whilst having the same level of rig, amazing, right?
293
00:15:43,800 –> 00:15:46,840
Speaker 1: We had the same conversation for the last three or
294
00:15:46,900 –> 00:15:51,190
Speaker 1: four years in content development in marketing, right, which is,
295
00:15:51,790 –> 00:15:54,010
Speaker 1: We need humans in this process because who can really
296
00:15:54,050 –> 00:15:58,210
Speaker 1: judge the quality of content? Humans. But, you know, when
297
00:15:58,290 –> 00:15:59,930
Speaker 1: AI has been really useful, if you kind of break
298
00:15:59,970 –> 00:16:02,930
Speaker 1: down the content development process has been, how do you
299
00:16:03,030 –> 00:16:07,860
Speaker 1: breathe faster? Can you produce more things at scale? Can
300
00:16:07,940 –> 00:16:13,740
Speaker 1: you do voiceover and copywriting and transcreation and all of
301
00:16:13,780 –> 00:16:17,320
Speaker 1: these things and get more for the same price for
302
00:16:17,340 –> 00:16:20,460
Speaker 1: more for less in a much faster time? but the
303
00:16:20,620 –> 00:16:23,620
Speaker 1: ultimate judge of quality is going to be the human
304
00:16:23,680 –> 00:16:27,580
Speaker 1: driving that process. I think that’s there to say, do
305
00:16:27,680 –> 00:16:29,560
Speaker 1: I think at some point in the future, you get
306
00:16:29,660 –> 00:16:33,660
Speaker 1: more agentic models doing more of the work? I think yes.
307
00:16:35,100 –> 00:16:37,020
Speaker 1: What I see in the pharma industry, which may be
308
00:16:37,100 –> 00:16:41,680
Speaker 1: slower than maybe consumer goods, is the regulatory process is
309
00:16:41,700 –> 00:16:46,000
Speaker 1: far more stringent, right? And that will take probably longer
310
00:16:46,110 –> 00:16:50,360
Speaker 1: to catch up. And also, people we partner with to
311
00:16:50,400 –> 00:16:56,560
Speaker 1: deliver these products to consumers are extremely expert in their field, right?
312
00:16:56,580 –> 00:17:02,729
Speaker 1: So HCPs and pharmacologists and doctors, they want trust first
313
00:17:02,790 –> 00:17:06,750
Speaker 1: and they need explicit proof that efficacy of the product works.
314
00:17:06,869 –> 00:17:09,530
Speaker 1: And we want to make sure we continue to deliver that.
315
00:17:10,230 –> 00:17:12,419
Speaker 2: I hear you. And obviously that makes a ton of sense.
316
00:17:12,460 –> 00:17:14,619
Speaker 4: And we’re going to go back to that point about
317
00:17:15,020 –> 00:17:18,119
Speaker 4: the history classes you didn’t take and pattern recognition. I
318
00:17:18,130 –> 00:17:23,320
Speaker 4: remember working with a number of OTC companies back in 2010, 2011,
319
00:17:23,320 –> 00:17:27,000
Speaker 4: that were reticent to get involved in social media because
320
00:17:27,740 –> 00:17:30,780
Speaker 4: adverse reaction. If somebody said, you know, I tried this
321
00:17:30,800 –> 00:17:34,679
Speaker 4: particular OTC product and my headache wasn’t resolved, then you
322
00:17:34,700 –> 00:17:36,620
Speaker 4: got to go report it to the FDA, at least
323
00:17:36,660 –> 00:17:37,179
Speaker 4: in the States.
324
00:17:37,920 –> 00:17:40,140
Speaker 2: Trust obviously being super credible as well.
325
00:17:40,740 –> 00:17:45,050
Speaker 4: But you’ve also raised instances where AI can help with workflow,
326
00:17:45,570 –> 00:17:51,129
Speaker 4: AI can help with content creation, obviously there’s a human component.
327
00:17:50,850 –> 00:17:51,490
Speaker 1: On all of it.
328
00:17:51,530 –> 00:17:55,430
Speaker 4: So maybe less on AI revolutionizing how a product comes
329
00:17:55,490 –> 00:17:58,220
Speaker 4: to life. But my question for you is as you,
330
00:17:58,460 –> 00:18:01,060
Speaker 4: as you come to Teva, you know, you kind of
331
00:18:01,100 –> 00:18:04,780
Speaker 4: have a little bit of a blank canvas. Are there
332
00:18:04,820 –> 00:18:08,520
Speaker 4: things that you’ve already started thinking about or doing that
333
00:18:08,680 –> 00:18:11,330
Speaker 4: has AI helping the work work faster?
334
00:18:11,350 –> 00:18:15,220
Speaker 1: Yes. It’s one of those things where my brain works
335
00:18:15,320 –> 00:18:18,859
Speaker 1: in kind of two speeds. You can build your vision
336
00:18:18,900 –> 00:18:21,020
Speaker 1: and your strategy, and that might take time and you
337
00:18:21,040 –> 00:18:24,119
Speaker 1: get to learn, learn the business and learn some of
338
00:18:24,240 –> 00:18:27,980
Speaker 1: the challenges and listen to people, really. But things that
339
00:18:28,020 –> 00:18:31,340
Speaker 1: came in saying that we can 10X the quantity of
340
00:18:31,420 –> 00:18:36,219
Speaker 1: content that we produce. And I think the teams had
341
00:18:36,280 –> 00:18:40,540
Speaker 1: already started to shift media mix towards digital. And I’d
342
00:18:40,560 –> 00:18:45,150
Speaker 1: say that’s somewhat behind CPG. So. It’s kind of easy
343
00:18:45,190 –> 00:18:48,250
Speaker 1: to think that way. But we know there’s a lot
344
00:18:48,330 –> 00:18:52,709
Speaker 1: of data and proof that if you don’t deliver content
345
00:18:52,750 –> 00:18:55,929
Speaker 1: that’s really fit for platform, you will fail. All of
346
00:18:55,990 –> 00:18:59,190
Speaker 1: your results and ROIs will show that it doesn’t work.
347
00:19:00,210 –> 00:19:02,760
Speaker 1: And we know that content is 70% of the ROI
348
00:19:02,840 –> 00:19:06,840
Speaker 1: of all of advertising, if not more. So I’d say
349
00:19:06,880 –> 00:19:09,570
Speaker 1: content was one of the first areas I really looked at.
350
00:19:10,330 –> 00:19:14,370
Speaker 1: And how can Gen AI really help us scale that
351
00:19:14,390 –> 00:19:20,070
Speaker 1: up whilst having control, right? So the added control layer
352
00:19:20,450 –> 00:19:24,560
Speaker 1: in OTC is, as you say, one side, the kind
353
00:19:24,580 –> 00:19:28,540
Speaker 1: of messaging you can put out. But also here in digital,
354
00:19:28,600 –> 00:19:33,380
Speaker 1: at least, there’s a lot of external regulatory checking that
355
00:19:33,420 –> 00:19:36,000
Speaker 1: needs to get done before a consumer can actually see
356
00:19:36,380 –> 00:19:40,480
Speaker 1: some social asset or something like that. It hasn’t reached
357
00:19:40,600 –> 00:19:43,359
Speaker 1: my desk yet in terms of the blocker hasn’t hit
358
00:19:43,380 –> 00:19:45,530
Speaker 1: me in the face. I’m kind of in blissful ignorance
359
00:19:45,619 –> 00:19:49,450
Speaker 1: around it right now. But I see where having a
360
00:19:49,590 –> 00:19:53,260
Speaker 1: systemic thought behind it can really help right so if
361
00:19:53,300 –> 00:19:56,160
Speaker 1: you can clear with external bodies kind of a claims
362
00:19:56,220 –> 00:20:01,030
Speaker 1: hierarchy or claims catalog if you can set a messaging
363
00:20:01,070 –> 00:20:05,389
Speaker 1: catalog where you can really think through realistically here’s the
364
00:20:05,410 –> 00:20:07,310
Speaker 1: things we’re going to say here’s things we’re absolutely not
365
00:20:07,369 –> 00:20:10,350
Speaker 1: going to say And then within that, plug that into
366
00:20:10,369 –> 00:20:13,169
Speaker 1: your gen AI system. So that is actually hard rules
367
00:20:13,650 –> 00:20:16,689
Speaker 1: embedded into what we deliver. I think that can really
368
00:20:16,750 –> 00:20:20,490
Speaker 1: speed us up and give us trust externally to try
369
00:20:20,510 –> 00:20:24,030
Speaker 1: and operate with more volume, more variety, and give us
370
00:20:24,090 –> 00:20:27,310
Speaker 1: more velocity. The thing which I think is going to
371
00:20:27,330 –> 00:20:30,630
Speaker 1: be really interesting to see is how we deal with
372
00:20:30,750 –> 00:20:36,650
Speaker 1: creators and influencers, because I think increasingly in AI and GEO,
373
00:20:37,130 –> 00:20:42,270
Speaker 1: because Outside of HCPs, consumers are picking up all of
374
00:20:42,290 –> 00:20:47,610
Speaker 1: their education from so many different sources now. And you
375
00:20:47,650 –> 00:20:53,800
Speaker 1: almost have to be there. Otherwise, there’s potential of picking
376
00:20:53,859 –> 00:20:59,679
Speaker 1: up incorrect information or potentially nuisance information, which could be
377
00:20:59,720 –> 00:21:03,000
Speaker 1: bad for you. So I think the period of time,
378
00:21:03,060 –> 00:21:07,290
Speaker 1: as you were saying, where there was risk aversion internally,
379
00:21:08,290 –> 00:21:10,119
Speaker 1: we may have kind of passed that hurdle now. And
380
00:21:10,130 –> 00:21:12,000
Speaker 1: it’s part of my job really to kind of continue
381
00:21:12,020 –> 00:21:16,040
Speaker 1: to educate the teams internally, whether it’s the pharmacological team
382
00:21:16,180 –> 00:21:18,619
Speaker 1: or the medical affairs team to say, look, how do
383
00:21:18,660 –> 00:21:21,460
Speaker 1: we address it? How do we get ahead of this problem?
384
00:21:21,859 –> 00:21:24,270
Speaker 1: Because AI isn’t really going to wait for us, right?
385
00:21:24,330 –> 00:21:26,929
Speaker 1: Someone is going to go into chat GPT and say,
386
00:21:26,970 –> 00:21:28,929
Speaker 1: how do we, what’s the best use of this product?
387
00:21:29,770 –> 00:21:31,990
Speaker 1: And if it’s out in the marketplace, you know, they’ll
388
00:21:32,010 –> 00:21:34,510
Speaker 1: find an answer. So it’s better that that answer comes
389
00:21:34,550 –> 00:21:34,790
Speaker 1: from us.
390
00:21:35,619 –> 00:21:40,060
Speaker 3: Well, there’s, An incredible amount of change that is certain.
391
00:21:40,760 –> 00:21:43,460
Speaker 3: And we have to ask you our famous last question,
392
00:21:43,520 –> 00:21:45,620
Speaker 3: which is what’s the bravest thing you’ve ever done?
393
00:21:45,720 –> 00:21:47,850
Speaker 1: I was looking forward to this question. I think the,
394
00:21:47,869 –> 00:21:51,429
Speaker 1: I was listening to the last podcast from you guys.
395
00:21:51,490 –> 00:21:54,110
Speaker 1: And I know one of my colleagues, Kevin Farland was
396
00:21:54,270 –> 00:21:56,530
Speaker 1: on maybe a year, year and a half ago. And
397
00:21:56,570 –> 00:22:00,470
Speaker 1: he talked about doing skydiving. And then a couple of
398
00:22:00,550 –> 00:22:03,210
Speaker 1: others talked about becoming a parent. And I’d say that’s
399
00:22:03,250 –> 00:22:05,979
Speaker 1: probably one of the bravest things. things anyone can do
400
00:22:06,000 –> 00:22:10,360
Speaker 1: because it really changes the way you behave and you
401
00:22:10,400 –> 00:22:13,200
Speaker 1: kind of have something to look after that’s bigger than yourself.
402
00:22:14,010 –> 00:22:15,930
Speaker 1: So I won’t do those, even though I’d say those
403
00:22:16,050 –> 00:22:19,290
Speaker 1: are probably the two bravest things I’ve done. Maybe for
404
00:22:19,310 –> 00:22:22,970
Speaker 1: this one, I’d say, look, leaving behind, I wouldn’t call
405
00:22:22,990 –> 00:22:26,480
Speaker 1: it high comfort, but a high profile role in Unilever
406
00:22:27,640 –> 00:22:30,679
Speaker 1: and deliberately put myself into a context where I’ve had
407
00:22:30,700 –> 00:22:33,580
Speaker 1: to start again. I’m learning a new industry. I learned
408
00:22:33,619 –> 00:22:37,240
Speaker 1: a completely different set of context, probably smaller brands with
409
00:22:37,280 –> 00:22:41,159
Speaker 1: more aggressive growth. And I’m having to reinvent myself, you know,
410
00:22:41,260 –> 00:22:45,170
Speaker 1: as an established leader. It’s handy doors, but I think,
411
00:22:45,190 –> 00:22:47,770
Speaker 1: you know, it’s harder than it sounds. But I’m really
412
00:22:47,810 –> 00:22:49,310
Speaker 1: excited about it. I think it’s going to be one
413
00:22:49,350 –> 00:22:52,930
Speaker 1: of my biggest growth accelerators. But I’m in the process
414
00:22:52,990 –> 00:22:54,350
Speaker 1: of being brave, let’s put it like that.
415
00:22:54,950 –> 00:22:57,170
Speaker 3: Well, it was so nice to get to know you
416
00:22:57,210 –> 00:23:00,220
Speaker 3: on a totally different level after all these years. And
417
00:23:00,260 –> 00:23:02,070
Speaker 3: we’re going to be following what’s going on in the
418
00:23:02,150 –> 00:23:05,930
Speaker 3: OTC and pharma category via your eyes. And thanks for sharing.
419
00:23:06,230 –> 00:23:07,890
Speaker 1: Great. Thank you.
420
00:23:10,630 –> 00:23:12,050
Speaker 3: If you like what you heard and you want to
421
00:23:12,090 –> 00:23:15,210
Speaker 3: go check out other Unilever alumni, go check out an
422
00:23:15,280 –> 00:23:18,080
Speaker 3: episode we did with Ryu, who is the chief digital
423
00:23:18,140 –> 00:23:20,920
Speaker 3: officer of Unilever. And if you like what you heard,
424
00:23:21,040 –> 00:23:23,480
Speaker 3: tell a friend, write a review. Thanks for listening.
425
00:23:33,490 –> 00:23:34,520
Speaker 2: Thank you.
426
00:23:48,410 –> 00:23:52,370
Speaker 5: Hi, I’m Jackie Cooper, Global Chief Brand Officer at Edelman
427
00:23:52,390 –> 00:23:55,149
Speaker 5: and the host of Touch of Truth, a new podcast
428
00:23:55,210 –> 00:23:58,649
Speaker 5: launching on the Adweek Podcast Network. My dad gave me
429
00:23:58,690 –> 00:24:02,369
Speaker 5: this incredibly smart piece of advice. Meet everyone once. As
430
00:24:02,410 –> 00:24:04,730
Speaker 5: a result, I’ve met some of the most fascinating and
431
00:24:04,790 –> 00:24:07,909
Speaker 5: inspiring people on the planet. Now on Touch of Truth,
432
00:24:08,119 –> 00:24:11,379
Speaker 5: we’re coming centre stage and sharing the mic to experience
433
00:24:11,420 –> 00:24:14,290
Speaker 5: stories of truth, insights and visions for the future that
434
00:24:14,310 –> 00:24:16,790
Speaker 5: will challenge your way of thinking. Touch of Truth is
435
00:24:16,850 –> 00:24:20,380
Speaker 5: available wherever you listen to podcasts. New episodes come out
436
00:24:20,580 –> 00:24:22,620
Speaker 5: every Tuesday. I do hope to see you there.